Let go green - Earth Topic
RSS icon Email icon Home icon
  • Ideas For Earth Day and Beyond: Helping Kids Care For the Earth

    Posted on August 30th, 2009 Topic Earth No comments


    Ideas For Earth Day and Beyond: Helping Kids Care For the Earth

    Earth Day is April 22, and while it’s important to get involved on this day, there are things we can do as families that will make a huge impact throughout the year.

    It starts with helping our kids to celebrate the world in which we live, and it continues with helping them to love it so much that they want to do everything they can to help protect it. Here are six ideas to help your kids celebrate and care for our earth:

    1. Get out and enjoy it. Researchers are now saying that simply getting kids outside in nature may be the most effective way to raise their awareness of environmental issues. Suddenly, these problems that they hear about on the news and in the classroom have a real impact on their daily lives. They see firsthand how a forest or a beach or a tidepool or a meadow is teeming with life, with ecological relationships that are interdependent, delicate and complex.

    To encourage your kids to get out there and enjoy the natural world, you may have to purposefully inject some extra excitement in the idea, but just at first. Take your dog (or a friend’s dog) for a walk in the woods. A dog’s love for nature, and subsequent enjoyment of it, is infectious. Create a list of things to find and make your adventure into the outdoors into a scavenger hunt.

    If possible, and if your kids are old enough to be by themselves out there, find a safe place for them to play in a natural environment. Allow them to go there to get away, to sit and think or to talk with their friends. Make a point to get the kids out in nature every day. Better yet, go with them.

    2. Watch “An Inconvenient Truth” as a family for inspiration. Invite some of your children’s friends over to watch it with their parents and talk about some initiatives that you can each commit to or some larger projects that you can work on as a neighborhood or community.

    3. Help your kids learn about endangered animals. Together, look into organizations that help endangered animals and see how you can get involved.

    4. Reduce and re-use, then recycle. Lots of kids get excited about recycling. Fewer are into reducing or re-using. Model to your children a healthy pattern of consumption. Talk frequently about the many benefits (which go way beyond environmental) of living a simple life and of being wary of a lifestyle of mass consumerism. As kids spend more time outside and less time at the mall or watching television advertisements, this shift may feel increasingly more natural to them.

    5. Teach your kids about potentially harmful chemicals and how they can be everywhere in our world: in the foods we eat, in the supplies we use to clean the house, in our paint, in our cosmetics, in our lawn care products. Turn the search for these things into a game and allow your kids to be detectives, learning about and seeking out these harmful chemicals and then finding natural alternatives.

    6. The next time you take the kids to the grocery store, see how you can minimize the amount of packaging that you purchase. We have been known to purposefully not purchase an item because of the manufacturer’s use of wasteful packaging. It won’t take long for the kids to realize that the best item in the store for minimal packaging: raw fruits and vegetables.

    In our family, the more we can make these life changes into a game, the more apt the kids are to follow suit. Help your kids to understand how one person really can make a difference (especially when that person is part of a committed family or group) and review often the personal impact that you all have made.

    Jamie Jefferson writes for Momscape.com and Susies-coupons.com, where you’ll find discounts on ethically-made natural beauty products as well as coupons for green living and organic products.

    China 2035 Bigger Than USA

  • Copenhagen’s Spring - Scientists Ask For Higher CO2 Cuts

    Posted on August 27th, 2009 Topic Earth No comments


    Copenhagen’s Spring - Scientists Ask For Higher CO2 Cuts

    The International Scientific Congress on Climate Change was held in Copenhagen between 10th to 12th March and organised by the International Alliance of Research Universities (IARU): the conclusions will be published into a full synthesis report next June. Almost 1,600 scientific contributions of researchers from over 70 countries have been received, and more than 2,500 delegates attended the event.

    Connie Hedegaard, Minister of Climate & Energy of Denmark said that we have “to avoid the unmanageable and manage the unavoidable” and she pointed to their example: this European country has become a net energy exporter in 30 years, creating a green growth as a stable solution of the 70s oil crisis. The messages of the congress are various. The risk that current trends of the climatic system will accelerate has a more defined and significant meaning: more probable abrupt and irreversible shifts, and we are already above the worst scenarios published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2001. Thus the big problem is trying to at least slow down these trends if not reverse them. The experts tell us that fast regional and global mitigation strategies are needed and that the more we wait the more expensive and ambitious actions will have to be taken in the future. The fact that scientists have come to the point of saying that “Inaction is Inexcusable” means also that people who studied relentlessly for decades are frustrated by the inaction of governments, businesses and people: it is understandable given that their work has not been considered and used enough, if not at all, up to now. They are speaking louder and clearer now. The different roles of politicians and scientists have to be combined. It is time for leaders to rely firmly on science as a basis for tough and unavoidable decisions. A “societal transformation” is being asked for by a wide group of the most intelligent people on the planet including diffusion of sustainable behaviours, innovative leadership, removal of subsidies and reduction of “vested interests”. These are all very explicit messages to politicians and public alike: there is a lot of work to do between now and next December’s COP15.

    In the final debate the Danish Prime Minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, summarised the six messages given by scientists as 6 keywords: Urgency (of the climate change challenge), Direction (long term target to be defined), Action (short term targets to be set), Fairness (to the poorest and most vulnerable), Opportunity (to originate large benefits), Governance (creation of a new global multilateral era). He stated firmly that “Business As Usual is dead” and asked his colleagues to follow Obama’s call for a Green New Deal, already asked for by public opinion and by many political parties in the world.

    After the final debate with the panel of scientists an impatient Rasmussen asked for clear words on the CO2 emission target to be set in the new treaty. Prof. Daniel Kammen, Obama’s Senior Policy Advisor, stated that an entire new industrial revolution is needed to cut 1990’s CO2 emissions by 80% in 2050 and Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf agreed on this point. The feeling was that the other panelists didn’t mind… At this point the Prime Minister concluded that the ambition for COP15 can be this -80% long-term objective following the precautionary principle to avoid worse impacts (than the ones presented in 2007 IPCC report) already hypothesized by new works. Overall a more direct communication between scientists and policy makers took place in this huge meeting: now it’s time for delegations to study and prepare the ground for brave steps forward to be made by the international community in Copenhagen’s crucial Conference of the Parties #15. Will we be able to navigate better our “ship” in the solar system during the over 200 rotations it will make before then?

    Written by Luca Marazzi on behalf of Responding to Climate Change.

    For further information on Climate Change please visit the Responding to Climate Change website -
    http://www.rtcc.org

    *Next event: Copenhagen, 24-26 May 2009. World Business Summit on Climate Change

    Clean Green Engine Fox News


    Solar Roadways: Paving The Way To Energy Freedom? « Mercury Rising …

    The Solar Roadways will collect solar energy to power businesses and homes via structurally-engineered solar panels that are driven upon, to be placed in parking lots and roadways in lieu of petroleum-based asphalt surfaces. …


    Boeing Subsidiary Spectrolab Achieves World Record Solar Cell …

    SYLMAR, Calif., (Boeing) — Spectrolab Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of The Boeing Company , today announced that a solar cell it manufactured has set a new.


    Truthdig - Ear to the Ground - Solar Power: Cheaper Than Ever

    2009/08/26 - Spain accounted for almost half of the world’s solar power market in 2008, thanks to a Spanish subsidy that is now ending. The subsidy change, combined with an increased supply of solar equipment from China and Taiwan, …


    NewNet News - CPS Energy and juwi solar agree joint development of …

    NewNet News - CPS Energy and juwi solar agree joint development of Blue Wing Solar project.


    Scientists achieve new record for solar cell efficiency

    SYDNEY - A team of Australian and US researchers has set a new record for solar cell efficiency, by developing a multi-cell array that achieved an efficiency of 43 percent, beating the previous world record by 0.3 percent.

  • Water Efficiency - Water Used in Generating US Electricity

    Posted on August 23rd, 2009 Topic Earth No comments


    Water Efficiency - Water Used in Generating US Electricity

    In my four-article series on water use (The Resource Matrix), I took you on a journey to reveal the layers of The Resource Matrix in order to help you understand how water will be a highly contested commodity tomorrow, possibly as much as oil is fought over today.

    You learned about your water footprint and a website where you can calculate it, virtual water and virtual water transfers, whereby choices here affect water availability elsewhere, to the point of some people not having enough water to drink in order to produce inexpensive dyed cotton, along with insane choices such as growing crops in the desert.

    You learned that on average it takes 1854 to 3000 gallons to produce one pound of beef.

    Yep, it’s it’s been a great journey through the sidetrip city of the Resource Matrix.

    Today, we’ve found the on-ramp to the Green Lighting Interstate and are driving to take a look at water use in generating electricity.

    For a simple reason. It takes a lot of water to produce electricity.

    How much? 5% of all US water? 10%? Can’t be as high as 25%?

    Electricity and water?

    I thought the issue was fossil fuels and greenhouse gases

    The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) estimated water use in the United States in 2000.

    Their grand total: 408 billion gallons per day withdrawn for all uses.

    The number 1 spot, weighing in at 48%, was thermoelectric power.

    Irrigation earned the runner-up prize at 34%.

    The 195 billion gallons need to come from somewhere, and actions have consequences. Environmental ones, as in 40 million fish in the Great Lakes killed each year due to being trapped against water intake devices. That’s a lot of Friday night fish dinners.

    How much water is used in generating electricity?

    Large fossil fuel and nuclear plants require incredible quantities of water for cooling and ongoing maintenance.

    Water for thermoelectric power is used in generating electricity with steam-driven turbine generators. It uses 48% of all water in the US.

    According to the Pace Energy and Climate Center, the amount of water used for power plant cooling varies by each specific power plant’s electricity generating technology and size. Nuclear reactors require the most water for cooling, and baseload fossil fuel power plants come in second.

    The Salem Nuclear Generating Station alone takes 3 billion gallons a day from the Delaware Bay, according to the Pace Energy and Climate Center.

    Nationally:

    • Steam electric generating plants across the nation draw in more than 200 billion gallons per day.
    • Nuclear and fossil fuel power plants drink over 185 billion gallons of water per day.
    • Geothermal power plants add another 2 billion or so gallons a day.
    • Most renewable energy technologies require little or no water for cooling.

    These numbers are starting to sound like the same ones the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve Bank use.

    Imagine watching your favorite science program where astronomers explain that the universe is 78 billion light-years wide (78 billion units of 5,878,630,000,000 miles). There is absolutely nothing in our experience to help us wrap our mind around it.

    How much is 3 billion gallons per day?

    The Delaware Bay feeds Salem Nuclear Generating Station 3 billion gallons a day.

    Imagine this rectangle: a football field with end zones (360 feet long x 160 feet wide). Then add to it walls on each side of the rectangle to create a container to hold the 3 billion gallons you pour into it.

    How high do you need to make those walls to contain 3 billion gallons? 6915 feet high. Or 1.3 miles.

    Maybe 6915 feet high is still hard to imagine. So how deep do you cover the field in order to feed the Salem plant every minute? Answer: 5 feet deep. Every minute.

    48% of all water use: We’re Number One!

    How much is 195 billion gallons per day?

    Using the USGS figure for 2000, thermoelectric power nationwide used 195 billion gallons a day, or 48% of all water used in the US. My guess is the water use has grown since then.

    How high are the walls on our football field now? 449,475 feet or 85 miles high. We’re back to US Treasury and astronomy numbers again.

    So, let’s get a higher-level view to help us.

    Lake Erie holds 116 cubic miles of water.

    Nationally, thermoelectric power uses 195 billion gallons a day - or 64.2 cubic miles a year.

    We drain Lake Erie every 22 months.

    But the water used is returned to its source.

    So what’s the issue about water use?

    Power generation returns 98% of the water back to its source (bay, lake, river, ocean).

    It’s the environmental consequences.

    The Pace Energy and Climate Center explains it neatly:

    Withdrawal of large volumes of surface water for either power plant cooling or hydropower generation can kill fish, larvae and other organisms trapped against intake structures (impinged), or swept up (entrained) in the flow through the different sections of a power plant.

    Examples include:

    • The Salem Nuclear Generating Station is responsible for an annual 11 percent reduction in weakfish and 31 percent reduction in bay anchovy.
    • At the Indian Point 2 and 3 reactors on the Hudson River, the number of fish impinged totaled over 1.5 million fish in 1987.
    • The 90 power plants using once-through-cooling on the Great Lakes kill in excess of 40 million fish per year due to impingement. (Once-through cooling needs a continual flow of new water, and uses 30 to 50 times that of a closed cycle system. Closed cycles cool down water from steam then reuse it.)

    The diversion of water out of the river removes water for healthy in-stream ecosystems:

    • Stretches below dams are often completely de-watered.
    • Fluctuations in water flow from peaking operations create a “tidal effect,” disrupting the downstream riparian community that supports its unique ecosystem.
    • A dam’s impoundment slows water flows, which hinders natural downstream migration of many fish species.
    • By slowing river flows, dams also allow silt to collect on river and reservoir bottoms and bury fish spawning habitat. Silt trapped above dams accumulates heavy metals and other pollutants. Disrupting the natural flow of sediments in rivers also leads to erosion of riverbeds downstream of the dam and increases risks of floods.
    • The impoundment of water by hydropower facilities fundamentally reshapes the physical habitat from a riverine to an artificial pond community.
    • This often eliminates native populations of fish and other wildlife.
    • Dams also impede the upstream and downstream movement of fish and other wildlife, and prevent the flow of plants and nutrients. This impact is most significant on migratory fish, which are born in the river and must migrate downstream early in life to the ocean and then migrate upstream again to lay their eggs (or “spawn”).
    • As mentioned above, withdrawal of water into turbines can also impinge or entrain significant numbers of fish.

    The cleanest kilowatt is the one never used:

    Back to those compact fluorescent lamps and LEDs

    PowerScorecard.org explains the solution:

    By re-directing electricity dollars to support environmentally benign energy resources, consumers are empowered, in states that offer supply choice, to influence the existing generating resources that are deployed to meet demand.

    They can also support the construction of new and cleaner electricity resources that will be built to meet overall growth in demand in the future. By supporting these power options, consumers can minimize many water use and consumption impacts. Still, directing your dollars to cleaner power products in no way helps remediate damages that already have occurred. Consumers can stop the construction of new hydropower facilities or alter conditions of siting and operation, but they cannot undo previous environmental degradation that occurred at existing hydropower facilities.

    In short, reduce your use of electricity.

    More Info:

    We used several sources for this article, including the PowerScorecard.org website, which is produced by the Pace Energy and Climate Center, which is part of the Pace University School of Law’s Center for Environmental Legal Studies, Pace University, White Plains, New York.

    On PowerScorecard, you can get:

    • Ratings of Electric Power Choices for some service areas.
    • More info on electricity and the environment:
      • Technologies
      • Climate change
      • Acid rain
      • Ozone depletion
      • Water use (our article today)
      • Water quality
      • Land: on-site and off-site impacts

    Thanks for letting us keep you updated . . .

    To your green, brighter future,

    Cinnamon Alvarez,

    A19

    And now I would like to offer you free access to powerful info on energy efficiency that’s easy to read and cuts through all this “green” information clutter — so you can literally start making positive changes today.

    You can access it now by going to: http://www.a19.com/pub/articles/

    From Cinnamon Alvarez: Founder, A19 — woman-owned green manufacturer of hand-made ceramic lighting fixtures

    TheGrahamBaileyShow Episode 3 in Going Green

  • Against Genetically Modified Foods

    Posted on August 21st, 2009 Topic Earth No comments


    Against Genetically Modified Foods

    Genetically modified (GM) foods are not being found to be safe for humans, or for the environment. There are a number of reasons why there a growing number of people are against GM foods. Are Genetically Modified Foods Safe? The reason to resist the growth of GM food in our diet is that it has a negative impact on our environment; plants and animals grown organically are not distorting their genetic makeup.

    And in the rush to accelerate the production of genetically modified foods, scientists are short cutting testing methods. Recently, the United States Tufts University, School of Medicine was involved in testing the effects of genetically modified rice directly on children (by-passing the usual practice of testing on animals). This direct testing on children created controversy and a formal letter of protest from 22 international scientists to the University; the protest letter has been made public through various social media. 
     
    The letter protested the use of children as a breach of medical ethics code since children cannot legally give their consent (since it is not deemed to be informed consent) to participate in experiments. As Professor David Schubert, Salk Institute of Biological Studies said, “…it is completely immoral to feed this rice to children without proper safety testing … [i]t’s like putting a new drug on the market with no toxicology or safety trials”.
     
    In defense of their position, the Golden Rice Organization issued a press release that states they “…us[ed] the correct Chinese and US government approved processes, the trials in China went ahead last year with the formal approval of their parents and the understanding of the children”.   How do children understand the impact of genetically modified food on themselves or the environment? It’s a complex subject that many adults have a hard time understanding. Also, how can anyone (parents, children, or testing scientists) understand what the long term effects of genetically modified “golden rice” are on the human body without prior study or testing? 
     
    More importantly, will the overall risks of genetically modified foods over time out weigh the alleged benefits? Farmers have cross-bred plants and animals for hundreds of years to improve their products. Improvements to size, produce yield, taste, hardiness have been achieved through relatively natural means and within nature’s own boundaries; different species were not bred together.
     
    With the discovery of DNA and a method of gene extraction, the concept of genetic modification was born. The intent of genetic modification is to create food that grows quickly, yields much, is resistant to pests, to disease, and to other natural events. However a number of scientists respond that the benefits are not worth the risks; genetically modified foods often become resistant to herbicides and pesticides requiring ever increasing amounts. There is the suspicion (still unproven) that pollinating bees have been affected by the increasing use of these chemicals and that both pollinator and predator species have been affected by the genetically modified crops (also known as transgenic crops) through habitat destruction and use of dangerous herbicides and pesticides. 
     
    Since the introduction of genetically modified foods, some scientists are reporting that food-related illness has increased. The only published human feeding study confirmed that genetic material in genetically modified soy transferred into the DNA of intestinal bacteria and continued to function. What long term impact will these foods have on the population and the environment?  There are many more potential risks in the development of genetically modified foods. Animals that were fed genetically modified feed appeared to suffer from increases in fetal death, low birth weight, sterility, and more. The concern is that human reproductive failure and sterility or infertility will be long term consequences to using GM foods.
     
    In the US, the Department of Agriculture reports that cotton and corn crops have been genetically modified to produce their own Bt toxins since 1996. Bt modified crops are insecticidal crystal proteins and are considered effective against crop-damaging caterpillars. The toxins are considered important for pest control and since resistance to herbicides and pesticides is growing, the sentiment is that these genetically engineered Bt toxins will help to protect the crops. The issue with the GM Bt toxins is that they are considered serious allergens; ever wonder why so many more children and adults are exhibiting allergic reactions than ever before?
     

    The problem with genetically modified foods is that there is also a reaction for the action; unfortunately, globally, in our rush to grow food supplies, we have not taken the time to properly test and research the long term impacts and effects of genetically modified foods. It is easy to be against GM foods - our planet is at risk.

    To read more about genetically modified foods and the healthy alternative - organic foods, please visit Is Organic Food Better?
    Kris Bovay is the owner of Voice Marketing Inc, the business and marketing services company, with a difference. She is also the owner of a small business website, more-for-small-business.com and an organic food website, Organic Food For Everyone. Kris has 25 years of experience in leading large, medium and small businesses … and a life-long passion for healthy food and a healthy environment. Copyright 2008 - 2009 Voice Marketing Inc.


    'Solar UFO' water cleaners afloat in Osaka canals ::: Pink Tentacle

    As part of the upcoming Aqua Metropolis festival in Osaka, engineering firm NTT Facilities has developed a pair of solar-powered, UFO-shaped floating water purifiers that will be deployed in the city’s canals and in the moat at Osaka …


    Nanotechnology Now - Press Release: “Oerlikon Solar and Rusnano …

    Oerlikon Solar today announced that Nano Solar Technology Ltd. (NST), a newly formed Russian high-tech firm, has ordered a 120 MW end-to-end Micromorph® line for production of thin film solar modules. NST is a Joint Venture between …


    Germany opens its largest PV solar power plant

    The ceremonial inauguration of the solar park, Lieberose, a venture between the project developer Juwi and module manufacturer First Solar took place today. This is Germany’s largest photovoltaic (PV) solar power plant in which about …


    Jennifer Marohasy » Total Solar Irradiance: Recalculated by N …

    Jennifer Marohasy - a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment.


    ReneSola shares jump over 15 percent after winning $706M solar …

    ReneSola lands $706M solar project, shares jumpNEW YORK â?? Shares of ReneSola Ltd. jumped on Thursday on news that the Chinese solar maker scored an exclusive right to develop a $706 million, 150 megawatt solar power plant in China.

  • Recycling Helps Prevent Global Warming - How to Keep the Environment Clean

    Posted on August 18th, 2009 Topic Earth No comments


    Recycling Helps Prevent Global Warming - How to Keep the Environment Clean

    If you want to keep the environment clean then you need to recycle everything you can. You should set aside a few spaces so that you can keep your recyclables in a separate area. All of your water bottles should go into one container so that it will make it easier for you to take them to the recycling center. Also you need to make sure that you recycle all of your chance and glass bottles as well because this will also help the environment. Many people do not know that you can also recycle your old newspaper, you can call to have it picked up each month.

    If we are going to prevent global warming than one way that you can take part is to recycle everything you use. the best thing you can do is educate yourself on the best way that you can recycle all of your throwaway items. Maybe some of your old clothes can be donated to Goodwill this way they can be recycled and used again. Make sure that you try to avoid using plastic bags from the grocery store because once they end up in a landfill they can cause a lot of problems. Once you have started a recycle program in your house you will find that it is easy to do.

    Remember that if you want to improve the environment you need to recycle everything you can. It always works better if you have specific containers that you use for each of your recyclable items. Once you make a few small steps towards improving the environment you will feel better about yourself.

    Get Free: Recycling Advice

    Save with: Great Recycling Tips

    Bryan Burbank is an expert in the field of Environmental Issues and Going Green

    MTV News Of MPSystem in Hungary

  • Water Efficiency - Water Used in Generating US Electricity

    Posted on August 14th, 2009 Topic Earth No comments


    Water Efficiency - Water Used in Generating US Electricity

    In my four-article series on water use (The Resource Matrix), I took you on a journey to reveal the layers of The Resource Matrix in order to help you understand how water will be a highly contested commodity tomorrow, possibly as much as oil is fought over today.

    You learned about your water footprint and a website where you can calculate it, virtual water and virtual water transfers, whereby choices here affect water availability elsewhere, to the point of some people not having enough water to drink in order to produce inexpensive dyed cotton, along with insane choices such as growing crops in the desert.

    You learned that on average it takes 1854 to 3000 gallons to produce one pound of beef.

    Yep, it’s it’s been a great journey through the sidetrip city of the Resource Matrix.

    Today, we’ve found the on-ramp to the Green Lighting Interstate and are driving to take a look at water use in generating electricity.

    For a simple reason. It takes a lot of water to produce electricity.

    How much? 5% of all US water? 10%? Can’t be as high as 25%?

    Electricity and water?

    I thought the issue was fossil fuels and greenhouse gases

    The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) estimated water use in the United States in 2000.

    Their grand total: 408 billion gallons per day withdrawn for all uses.

    The number 1 spot, weighing in at 48%, was thermoelectric power.

    Irrigation earned the runner-up prize at 34%.

    The 195 billion gallons need to come from somewhere, and actions have consequences. Environmental ones, as in 40 million fish in the Great Lakes killed each year due to being trapped against water intake devices. That’s a lot of Friday night fish dinners.

    How much water is used in generating electricity?

    Large fossil fuel and nuclear plants require incredible quantities of water for cooling and ongoing maintenance.

    Water for thermoelectric power is used in generating electricity with steam-driven turbine generators. It uses 48% of all water in the US.

    According to the Pace Energy and Climate Center, the amount of water used for power plant cooling varies by each specific power plant’s electricity generating technology and size. Nuclear reactors require the most water for cooling, and baseload fossil fuel power plants come in second.

    The Salem Nuclear Generating Station alone takes 3 billion gallons a day from the Delaware Bay, according to the Pace Energy and Climate Center.

    Nationally:

    • Steam electric generating plants across the nation draw in more than 200 billion gallons per day.
    • Nuclear and fossil fuel power plants drink over 185 billion gallons of water per day.
    • Geothermal power plants add another 2 billion or so gallons a day.
    • Most renewable energy technologies require little or no water for cooling.

    These numbers are starting to sound like the same ones the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve Bank use.

    Imagine watching your favorite science program where astronomers explain that the universe is 78 billion light-years wide (78 billion units of 5,878,630,000,000 miles). There is absolutely nothing in our experience to help us wrap our mind around it.

    How much is 3 billion gallons per day?

    The Delaware Bay feeds Salem Nuclear Generating Station 3 billion gallons a day.

    Imagine this rectangle: a football field with end zones (360 feet long x 160 feet wide). Then add to it walls on each side of the rectangle to create a container to hold the 3 billion gallons you pour into it.

    How high do you need to make those walls to contain 3 billion gallons? 6915 feet high. Or 1.3 miles.

    Maybe 6915 feet high is still hard to imagine. So how deep do you cover the field in order to feed the Salem plant every minute? Answer: 5 feet deep. Every minute.

    48% of all water use: We’re Number One!

    How much is 195 billion gallons per day?

    Using the USGS figure for 2000, thermoelectric power nationwide used 195 billion gallons a day, or 48% of all water used in the US. My guess is the water use has grown since then.

    How high are the walls on our football field now? 449,475 feet or 85 miles high. We’re back to US Treasury and astronomy numbers again.

    So, let’s get a higher-level view to help us.

    Lake Erie holds 116 cubic miles of water.

    Nationally, thermoelectric power uses 195 billion gallons a day - or 64.2 cubic miles a year.

    We drain Lake Erie every 22 months.

    But the water used is returned to its source.

    So what’s the issue about water use?

    Power generation returns 98% of the water back to its source (bay, lake, river, ocean).

    It’s the environmental consequences.

    The Pace Energy and Climate Center explains it neatly:

    Withdrawal of large volumes of surface water for either power plant cooling or hydropower generation can kill fish, larvae and other organisms trapped against intake structures (impinged), or swept up (entrained) in the flow through the different sections of a power plant.

    Examples include:

    • The Salem Nuclear Generating Station is responsible for an annual 11 percent reduction in weakfish and 31 percent reduction in bay anchovy.
    • At the Indian Point 2 and 3 reactors on the Hudson River, the number of fish impinged totaled over 1.5 million fish in 1987.
    • The 90 power plants using once-through-cooling on the Great Lakes kill in excess of 40 million fish per year due to impingement. (Once-through cooling needs a continual flow of new water, and uses 30 to 50 times that of a closed cycle system. Closed cycles cool down water from steam then reuse it.)

    The diversion of water out of the river removes water for healthy in-stream ecosystems:

    • Stretches below dams are often completely de-watered.
    • Fluctuations in water flow from peaking operations create a “tidal effect,” disrupting the downstream riparian community that supports its unique ecosystem.
    • A dam’s impoundment slows water flows, which hinders natural downstream migration of many fish species.
    • By slowing river flows, dams also allow silt to collect on river and reservoir bottoms and bury fish spawning habitat. Silt trapped above dams accumulates heavy metals and other pollutants. Disrupting the natural flow of sediments in rivers also leads to erosion of riverbeds downstream of the dam and increases risks of floods.
    • The impoundment of water by hydropower facilities fundamentally reshapes the physical habitat from a riverine to an artificial pond community.
    • This often eliminates native populations of fish and other wildlife.
    • Dams also impede the upstream and downstream movement of fish and other wildlife, and prevent the flow of plants and nutrients. This impact is most significant on migratory fish, which are born in the river and must migrate downstream early in life to the ocean and then migrate upstream again to lay their eggs (or “spawn”).
    • As mentioned above, withdrawal of water into turbines can also impinge or entrain significant numbers of fish.

    The cleanest kilowatt is the one never used:

    Back to those compact fluorescent lamps and LEDs

    PowerScorecard.org explains the solution:

    By re-directing electricity dollars to support environmentally benign energy resources, consumers are empowered, in states that offer supply choice, to influence the existing generating resources that are deployed to meet demand.

    They can also support the construction of new and cleaner electricity resources that will be built to meet overall growth in demand in the future. By supporting these power options, consumers can minimize many water use and consumption impacts. Still, directing your dollars to cleaner power products in no way helps remediate damages that already have occurred. Consumers can stop the construction of new hydropower facilities or alter conditions of siting and operation, but they cannot undo previous environmental degradation that occurred at existing hydropower facilities.

    In short, reduce your use of electricity.

    More Info:

    We used several sources for this article, including the PowerScorecard.org website, which is produced by the Pace Energy and Climate Center, which is part of the Pace University School of Law’s Center for Environmental Legal Studies, Pace University, White Plains, New York.

    On PowerScorecard, you can get:

    • Ratings of Electric Power Choices for some service areas.
    • More info on electricity and the environment:
      • Technologies
      • Climate change
      • Acid rain
      • Ozone depletion
      • Water use (our article today)
      • Water quality
      • Land: on-site and off-site impacts

    Thanks for letting us keep you updated . . .

    To your green, brighter future,

    Cinnamon Alvarez,

    A19

    And now I would like to offer you free access to powerful info on energy efficiency that’s easy to read and cuts through all this “green” information clutter — so you can literally start making positive changes today.

    You can access it now by going to: http://www.a19.com/pub/articles/

    From Cinnamon Alvarez: Founder, A19 — woman-owned green manufacturer of hand-made ceramic lighting fixtures

    Bucks USA economic trends - Green technology


    naked capitalism: Guest Post: Is the Sun Setting on Solar Stocks?

    Commentary on current economic and financial news.


    Saco Maine's Town Council Unanimously Approves Solar Project …

    A Boston Globe report from earlier this week has the folks here at EcoWorld pleased again about what’s stirring in New England. The town of Saco Maine recently met and when they did, the town’s councilors unanimously approved to enter …


    NewNet News - Energy Conversion Devices agree supply of UNI-SOLAR …

    NewNet News - Energy Conversion Devices agree supply of UNI-SOLAR laminates with Mercury Solar Systems.


    Samsung's Blue Earth solar touchscreen phone gets dubbed S7550 …

    Samsung has been teasing us with its Blue Earth solar-powered smartphone since February, and now it’s showing us a bit more of that sultry photovoltaic skin a mere day after its budget-minded solar brother, the E1107, came out into the …


    Climateer Investing: Solar: Gloom, Doom and Despair (LDK et al)

    It was a tough day watching the solar meltdown in the markets. I took a huge hit in my portfolio as I am long LDK Solar (click on image above to feel my pain). Other solar stocks also got whacked hard. …

  • Takes Care of Two Things at Once: Composting Food Waste

    Posted on August 8th, 2009 Topic Earth No comments


    Takes Care of Two Things at Once: Composting Food Waste

    Years ago my dad taught me the benefits of composting food waste. It had nothing to do with any type of “green” movement or being environmentally friendly, no, it had everything to do with reintroducing nutrients back into the soil.

    Here is what he taught me then and it still holds true today. By burying your food waste and kitchen scraps (no steak bones though), you are providing a quality food source for the creatures that live in your soil. From micro organisms and those creatures that the human eye can not see, up to worms, which of course we do see.

    See, what happens is these creatures eat the food (and of course each other) and then finally the worms eat basically everything and their castings (worm poop) create the best nutrients your soil could ever have. By continually supplying your garden soil with food waste you are feeding the earthly creatures and they reward you with healthy soil. Now where can you get a trade off like that!

    Ok so here is how you do it. Get yourself a fairly large Tupperware bowl. One large enough to hold at least a week’s worth of food scraps. Then after each meal dump everything and anything into that bowl. Just do not put steak bones in there, they wont biodegrade or be eaten by the worms. Banana peels, apple peels, coffee grinds, fish, vegetable scraps, egg shells and basically anything you don’t eat, all qualifies.

    When your Tupperware bowl gets full, take it out to your garden and dig a hole about a foot to two feet deep and then dump the food scraps into the hole. Fill in the hole with the dirt and mark the spot with a stick or something else so that you do not dig up that area again for another three months. You need to give those little rascals some time to eat it all.

    Now you simply repeat this process as the Tupperware bowl gets full. If you find that you live in colder climates where the ground may freeze for lengthy periods of time, then consider starting a warm box to recycle your food scraps. That goes beyond the scope of this article but I am sure if you Googled the search term “vermicompost” you will get all the information you will ever need.

    So what are the two things I was talking about earlier? Well obviously the first is you are adding nutrients to your soil through composting food waste. The second is by composting your food waste you are limiting the amount of garbage that ends up in a landfill. The average four person house hold creates about 8 pounds of food waste per week. If every family in America followed this process we would eliminate nearly one billion pounds of food waste garbage a year. Now that is a lot of trash!

    Do your part and compost your food waste. The worms in your garden will love you for it and so will everyone else in the environment.

    About the Author
    Bruce Tucker is a contributing writer to Mike’s How-To Blog, a blog that covers a wide variety of topics and how to do them. You can also follow him on Twitter.

    Farmers market with Chef Carlin


    Solar stocks: hot or not? - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money

    Several high-profile solar companies recently reported earnings, and although these companies posted mixed results for the most recent quarter, there’s no denying that Wall Street has been turning its face toward the sun and bidding up …


    More Cash for Clunkers, Less Cash for Solar - Environmental …

    Cash-for-clunkers means less money for clean energy, analysts say.


    Ceramatec Develops 24-hour Solar Energy Storage Battery | Cooler …

    Salt Lake City-based Cerametec, Inc. is in development of a battery that solar energy users outside the grid could use to store energy from their solar panels for most of a day, and its size and configuration â?? almost fitting in the …


    America's First Solar Thermal Plant Is On | GOOD

    Our own energy and environment columnist Ben Jervey passed along news that America’s first solar thermal power plant, in Lancaster, California, is now fully.


    The Oil Drum | Rate Crimes: Impeding the Solar Tipping Point

    Yet, as one explores the landscape, artifacts of the capture of solar energy are conspicuously absent. This dearth is true for solar electric, domestic hot water, passive solar design, and even for urban design. …

  • The Canada Pine Beetle

    Posted on August 8th, 2009 Topic Earth No comments


    The Canada Pine Beetle

    For some time now, the extremely destructive Pine Beetle ( Dendroctonus ponderosae ) is ravaging huge areas of Canada’s forestlands and its destruction is so virulent, that it is leaving massive and easily visible scars across otherwise green foliage landscapes. In numerous areas where the pine beetle is active, various solutions for its eradication have been tried and some of these in themselves, are so toxic in nature that they would normally be classed as being a larger risk than the beetle they are attempting to destroy.

    These beetles have an average life span of about one year and generally, their eggs are laid through the bark of a tree where they develop into larvae that stay under the bark all through the winter months. During the spring the larvae continue to feed under the bark and then they will change into pupae during the months of June and July. During the rest of the summer and into fall, the new adult pine beetles leave the infested tree through emergence holes they create and after drying themselves in the warm sunshine, they take off to mate and commence a new cycle by laying the next generation’s eggs under the bark of new trees. 

    During the time they remain under the bark of a tree, they are known to transmit a fungus type substance that stains the sapwood of the tree a blue colour. Other than discoloration, this blue colouring appears to have no adverse affects on the actual structural integrity of the tree. However, we must not forget that the damage has already been done and like a rolling snowball, it gather momentum and range of spread with each summer that comes. These beetles prefer mature trees such as lodge pole pines which are considered mature after eighty years of growth and in the Province of British Columbia, current statistics show that there are three times more mature lodge pole pines than they had over ninety years ago. Hot and dry summers make the trees more stressed and thus more susceptible to attack and infestation by this ravenous little creature. Trees which have been attacked will turn red roughly one year after the infestation and then, between one and two years later the affected trees will turn grey and all of their needles will fall off.

    Another interesting fact about these little guys is they do not like it too cold! Their eggs, larvae and pupae are very susceptible to very cold temperatures and if these temperatures remain below minus 35 Celsius for a prolonged period of maybe a week, then this will kill off the eggs, larvae, pupae and generally sizeable portions of the beetle population in that area of cold weather. This being said, unless we suddenly enter the start of a new ice age all across Canada, these sporadic cold spells are unfortunately not enough to rid us of this continually spreading plague of destruction.   Yes, there are action plans prepared and in place and yes, the Canadian Ministry of Forests and Range are really trying to get to grips with finding a solution to this costly problem but to date, the efforts and methodology being used has had little or no effect on the overall problem.

    The good news is that an answer to this massive problem does exist and better still, it is an answer, which consists of no chemicals, no toxins, no poisons and no danger to either the forest or to the people who would apply the solution. This answer can be found right now in the form of a golden all natural organic fluid formulated around a cedar oil base. This fluid can totally eradicate the pine beetle and a few other nasty insects at the same time. It is not cheap but then again it is not as expensive as some of the other treatment that have been tried. It is non hazardous and will not harm the environment in any way and it is here and available right now. Unfortunately, for now it appears that here it must stay as the Ministry of Forests and Range are continuing their quest with what they feel they know best. Maybe someday, hopefully soon, they will realize that we can defeat this natural pest by using a totally natural substance.

    Bob Littlejohn MBA BSc

       


    Solar stocks: hot or not? - Top Stocks Blog - MSN Money

    Several high-profile solar companies recently reported earnings, and although these companies posted mixed results for the most recent quarter, there’s no denying that Wall Street has been turning its face toward the sun and bidding up …


    More Cash for Clunkers, Less Cash for Solar - Environmental …

    Cash-for-clunkers means less money for clean energy, analysts say.


    Ceramatec Develops 24-hour Solar Energy Storage Battery | Cooler …

    Salt Lake City-based Cerametec, Inc. is in development of a battery that solar energy users outside the grid could use to store energy from their solar panels for most of a day, and its size and configuration â?? almost fitting in the …


    America's First Solar Thermal Plant Is On | GOOD

    Our own energy and environment columnist Ben Jervey passed along news that America’s first solar thermal power plant, in Lancaster, California, is now fully.


    The Oil Drum | Rate Crimes: Impeding the Solar Tipping Point

    Yet, as one explores the landscape, artifacts of the capture of solar energy are conspicuously absent. This dearth is true for solar electric, domestic hot water, passive solar design, and even for urban design. …

  • Green Shopping Basics - What You Should Know Before You Shop Green

    Posted on August 7th, 2009 Topic Earth No comments


    Green Shopping Basics - What You Should Know Before You Shop Green

    Going green always starts with good intentions, but the massive amount of green terms can sometimes be overwhelming. Here’s some of the common green terms you’ll hear and what they mean.

    Organic
    The term organic can often be used very broadly, but typically refers to products that have only organic components, produced without pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, or fertilizers or other harmful chemicals.
    Look for: USDA Certified Organic

    Sustainable
    Products or materials that are described as being sustainable contain materials that do not deplete the Earth of its resources and is easily replenished. There are many common types of materials that are considered sustainable:

    Bamboo - Bamboo is a fast-growing and renewable resource that can be used to make fabrics, flooring, furniture and other products.

    Jute - Jute is a long and shiny vegetable plant fiber that can be woven into a strong thread or twine. It is commonly used to create cloth or used within carpets, and rugs.

    Hemp - Hemp is a fast-growing plant that is most commonly used for its strong fibers to create cloth used in bags and clothing. It can grow organically and also be used to create oils for cosmetic products as well as be used in food.

    Sustainable Wool - There are many types of sustainable animal wools such as alpaca fibers or merino wool that can be used to create strong fibers commonly used in clothing.

    Energy-Efficient
    Products that are energy-efficient are design to consume less energy when operating without sacrificing performance, reducing long-term environmental and cost impacts. Energy-efficient products can range from appliances to light bulbs as well as contain different levels of efficiency.
    Look for: Energy Star Qualified, EPEAT Rated

    Post-Consumer Recycled
    Once a product has completely served its purpose, what remains are post-consumer materials that would otherwise be disposed as waste but are instead recycled. This would include products such as old packaging, glass bottles, aluminum cans, and plastics. When you recycle from your home these products become post-consumer recycled.

    How is this different vs recycled? Regular recycled materials can contain a combination of materials, often coming a scraps or other by-products as a result of manufacturing. This could include both pre-consumer and post-consumer waste.

    Recyclable
    A recyclable product means that it can be recycled and be used to create future products. Polypropylene #5 is a common plastic to look for in products which is one of the most easily recyclable plastics.
    Look for: Polypropylene #5

    Reusable
    Reusable products mean that a product can be used multiple times before the product is discarded or recycled. Some common reusable products are shopping bags, water bottles and tableware.

    Fair Trade
    Fair Trade is a social movement that promotes certain standards of sustainability practices and empowering producers in developing nations. Fair trade supports fair prices, fair labor conditions, community development and environmental sustainability.

    Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
    VOCs are organic chemical compounds that have high vapor pressure and easily evaporate at room temperature. VOCs can be released from many household items such as paints, flooring, upholstery, and cleaners. These VOCs are not only air pollutants but have also been known to cause health effects as well.
    Look for: Low-VOC, Zero-VOC

    Bisphenol A (BPA)
    BPA is an organic compound that is used in the creation of many plastics and resins. Most commonly you will find BPA used polycarbonate bottles. While there is some controversy about the effects of BPA, some research has raised serious health concerns about the usage of BPA.
    Look for: BPA-free

    Biodegradable
    Biodegradable means that a substance can be naturally decomposed by biological processes. If a product is biodegradable, this means that it can be disposed of with no negative environmental impacts.

    Solar-Powered
    Solar powered products are powered using energy from the sun. Solar power can be used in a range of products from small household gadgets to entire home heating systems.

    Now you’re ready to start shopping for green products!

    To learn about more about shopping for green products, please visit the All Green Store.

    IDGTV: Tech News For Update


    Rate Crimes: Impeding the Solar Tipping Point | 1800blogger

    Yet, as one explores the landscape, artifacts of the capture of solar energy are conspicuously absent. This dearth is true for solar electric, domestic hot water, passive solar design, and even for urban design. …


    Greentech Media

    The utility’s proposal had attracted an uproar from solar companies and from its customers. The state’s Public Utilities Commission was due to hold a hearing on the proposal Wednesday, and that was canceled with Xcel decided not to …


    Are rainy days gone for solar? - Green Chemicals

    While some reports indicate that investments in the solar market is shining again, others claimed continued cloudy days because of capital intensive projects and growing overcapacity in some regions (ok, I’ll stop the weather talk). …


    India invests in solar power - Physics Today News Picks

    Nature News: India’s prime minister Manmohan Singh has approved a US$19 billion plan to make the country a global leader in solar energy over the next three decades. The ambitious project would see a massive expansion in installed solar


    Live: eSolar Flips the Switch on First Solar Power Tower in U.S.

    Updated with notes from the event:eSolar, a solar developer that uses modular designs, small mirrors and computing power to lower …

  • Electronics Recycling

    Posted on August 4th, 2009 Topic Earth No comments


    Electronics Recycling

    Society’s technological advancements have grown significantly over the years. Electronics devices such as telephones, cell phones, radios, CD and DVD players, televisions, and computers are products that are used in every household. These items are just a few of the many electronic devices that can cause serious environmental damage due to their toxic components. Electronics that are in need of disposal are referred to as e-waste, or electronic waste. Because of the advancement of electronic products, there has been a growing concern about the hazards of electronic waste. Some of these concerns include: improper disposal of toxic materials, health and safety concerns for people disposing of these items, as well as dangers to the soil and water supply. For instance, electronics are made using a considerable amount of toxic substances such as lead, cadmium, aluminum, zinc, copper, and plastics which can all leak poisonous material in the ground and water. These environmental concerns have resulted in the establishment of electronic recycling facilities and industries who take old electronics such as computers for the purpose of recycling and safe disposal.

    Electronics containing materials such as metals, plastic, are valuable to the recycling companies. Disposing of electronics through a recycling company will result in fewer electronic devices going into landfills and lower carbon emissions.

    Recovering Raw Materials: Recycling electronics involves recovering raw materials from the electronic equipment. Materials such as steel, copper, wires, aluminum, brass, plastics, glass,etc., are extracted and sold to smelters so they can create raw materials. Depending on the type of metal being extracted, they can be processed and used in products required by such businesses as the steel, construction and cement industry. Plastics and wood can be used as fuel to provide heat to industrial furnaces which converts to steam. Metals such as copper are sold to metal refineries.

    Plastics: Plastics from such items as computers, computer mice, and keyboards, are sent through shredding processes and machine sorted. They are then sent to other recyclers for further processing.

    Larger Electronics: Items such as televisions and computer monitors are dismantled by hand. The leaded glass cathode ray tubes are removed and disposed of safely. Plastics, copper, and circuit boards are removed, separated, and processed.

    Hazardous Items: Toxic items are removed from electronic devices and disposed of safely. Toxic substance can include leaded glass, rechargeable batteries, non-rechargeable batteries (i.e.alkaline, lead acid, cell batteries) mercury in lamps and switches, parts containing polychlorinated biphenyls, as well as ink and toner cartridges. The remaining non toxic materials are processed and the recyclable materials are recovered. The materials are shredded and separated according to type. For instance, they can be divided into such materials as steel, copper, aluminum, and plastic.

    Refurbished Electronics: There are now many companies that acquire used computers, repair and update them, and resell them at a much lower price. This is a great way to keep electronics out of landfills and make technology more affordable.

    Donate Your Computer: If you are getting rid of your old computer because of a recent upgrade, consider donating it to charity. Many schools and non profit organisations are in need of computers. There are companies and businesses that will take your computer, refurbish it, and donate it to a needy cause. Make sure your computer is wiped clean of all information before donating it. Donating your computer helps the community and the environment.

    We are fast becoming a technology dependent society. When it comes to protecting and conserving our environment, we have to adapt and change our technological practices to ensure a sustainable future. Recycling electronics is a great way help the planet.

    Know that repairing a computer or laptop repair Toronto is not cheap, but it can be cheaper than having to replace the computer. If you run into these situations, you will need to hire a onsite computer repair service Toronto.

    2008 - Going Green Tech News